“A Window on the Northwest”
November 24, 2005
Hydro Rates and Regional Pricing in NWO
With more announcement of plant closures due in part to the high cost of energy in Northwestern Ontario, the call for innovative solutions and a made in the North pricing policy is gaining ground, with the hope that it will soon reach a receptive ear at the provincial level. Given the region economy’s heavy reliance on power and the fall-out already occurring across local industries, failure in dealing with this very important issue is not an option. This article will deal with the concept of regional pricing and what it may mean for the North.
Is
Being tapped into the provincial
grid, also means that any new supply or generation of power coming from this
region (remember this when new investments will be announced) will not directly
translate into lower electricity costs for regional users since any new
investor would not be obliged to sell to us when demand is out there from
eastern Ontario and the U.S. The only way this would change is if the
provincial government makes some adjustments to the way it views the energy
market in
Can a case for regional pricing be made?
The case that has been made with the Ministry of Energy is to look at regional pricing (Local Marginal Pricing) in order to benefit those areas like our region that are more self-sufficient. However, this concept is a double edged sword since it includes many price variables such as the contribution of lower cost nuclear power to the local system, the unreliability of the hydroelectric system during times of low water levels, and the announcement on phasing out fossil fuel generation. In other words, being tapped into the provincial grid gives us more price and supply flexibility if something was to go wrong. On the other hand, our self-sufficiency makes for a strong case for regional pricing. A Market Advisory Committee to look into this concept has been established for some time now, but in light of recent events, regional pricing should gain a priority position on their agenda.
Conclusion
Problems can also create opportunities, and a combination of new technologies that can be implemented fairly quickly such as clean coal (we should not be giving up on this one given its low-cost and importance to the regional power supply) wind, solar, biomass, co-generation, fuel cells, smaller generation units, and of course, long-term projects like new transmission lines connecting east and west and south to the US, would allow for more flexibility in the system (the benefits of tapping into lower-cost power from Manitoba have already been recognized and plans are moving forward in this area). Our ability as a region to now make a compelling case for our unique location and mix of power generating capabilities that are not only cost effective but environmentally friendly, can make the difference between becoming a model for new long term solutions to the problem, or just another forgotten part of the system.